THE WORST BANKER IN HISTORY: HOW JOHN BLUNT RUINED MILLIONS

Tuesday, February 7, 2012


He was an ugly man - fat, pompous and unscrupulous.
Blunt: fat and pompous
He was also a gambler whose only desire in life was to get as rich aspossible.
Yet John Blunt had two qualities in his favour: he was self-confidentand charismatic - a man who quickly gained the ear of the political elite.
He charmed politicians and then exploited them. In so doing, he wouldinstigate one of the greatest financial catastrophes in history.
The countdown to disaster began in January, 1720, when Blunt developed ascheme to eradicate Britain’s crippling national debt.
The South Sea Bubble: an 18th century cartoon
This debt stood at £31million - a staggering sum - and the governmentwas struggling to pay the £1.5million annual interest payments.
Blunt decided to use the South Sea Company, of which he was director, topromote his revolutionary scheme.
You get one, I get three
He was aided by the fact that two of the key figures in the government -Earl Sunderland and Earl Stanhope - knew nothing about finance.
They had deferred financial policy to John Aislabie, the ineptChancellor of the Exchequer. It was to Aislabie that Blunt now presented hisgrand idea.
It appeared blissfully simple. He offered to take over Britain’s entirenational debt - and there was only one condition attached. For every £100 ofdebt he assumed, Blunt demanded the right to issue £100 of new stock for theSouth Sea Company.
A big gamble: Hogarth's vision of the bubble
This made no sense to Aislabie. He couldn’t understand how anyone wasgoing to make any money out of such a transaction.
The answer was a neat little scam - one that depended on Blunt beingable to artificially raise the market value of South Sea shares.
It worked like this: if an individual held £1,200 of bad Governmentsecurities - and wished to convert them into South Sea stock - the companywould be allowed to issue 12 new shares at £100 each.
But if the market value of each share could be manipulated upwards to,say, £300, then the company would only have to give the individual four shares,since these would equal £1,200.
Aislabie: a brilliant idea
It would continue to hold the eight remaining shares, which it couldthen sell at £300 each, netting the tidy sum of £2,400. In one simpletransaction, Blunt would make an enormous sum of money. And he promised to make money for the country as well.
Chancellor Aislabie was impressed by the scheme and presented it toMembers of Parliament. They were no less impressed. Blunt already had a trackrecord at manipulating the markets: no one doubted he’d be able to artificiallyincrease the value of the South Sea Company shares.
After a long debate, it was decided to give him the green light.Britain’s economy was being placed in the hands of one man - and a highly dubiousindividual at that.
Everyone expected the national debt soon to be a thing of the past. Butthere was one serious drawback to Blunt’s scheme: it was little more than anempty gamble whose success was dependent on his ability to keen the price ofstock artificially high.
Even the king bought shares
Blunt bribed ministers in order to set the ball rolling and people soonbegan to invest huge sums of money in the newly issued shares.
The king was no exception: he bought heavily and made £86,000 profit onhis investment. He promptly knighted this banking genius.
‘The eyes of the world were turned from the chief ministers of state tothis great oracle,’ wrote Aislabie.
The newly knighted Blunt had proved true to his word: now, he found fameand fortune in equal measure.
The speculating frenzy lasted for eight months and involved much of thenation: the value of shares exceeded all expectations, rising to £1,000 in thesummer of 1720.
He ruined the nation - but not himself
And then - dramatically - the bubble burst. The share value crashed aspeople realized the hollowness of Blunt’s promises. Overnight, thousands offamilies lost their lifetime’s savings. Many were left bankrupt.
‘They have lived their dream,’ wrote Alexander Pope, ‘and on awakeningfound nothing in their hands.’
John Blunt ran away from the crisis he’d caused. He hid in Kent until hewas discovered and ordered back to London. He was stripped of his remainingfortune and left the capital in disgrace.
Yet he had the last laugh. He was given a large allowance - and an evenlarger house - by his son, who’d made a fortune out of the artificially createdboom. 
UK paperback

NOW PUBLISHED IN PAPERBACK
Wolfram: The Boy Who Went to War available here for just £5.30


And for my American readers, it is now published under the title: The Boy Who Went to War: The Story of a Reluctant German Soldier in WWII available here
Newly published US edition
'Idiosyncratic and utterly fascinating... an extraordinary tale of hardship, horror and amazing good fortune' James Delingpole, The Daily Mail 

Get Paid To Promote, Get Paid To Popup, Get Paid Display Banner